Wouldn’t an easier approach to this be just making the operator >= than doing all the coding that we did?
How would using >= resolve the issue?
As the instructor states, when it’s just > then the platform of course overshoots from its original position by 1 unit.
However when it’s >= then it’ll just measure the distance reaches 0 then.
I think you misunderstood. The problem occurs if it moves past the target distance, the problem isn’t with comparing with > that’s just when the problem happens.
By using >= you would just be including the case where it wasn’t a problem.
That clears it up! Thanks!
This topic was automatically closed 24 hours after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.