Thanks for linking your other thread! I read it and there is nothing to be added from my side there.
I still have to write my “feedback” which I will do on monday, but its more or less what you said. I also had to look up the documentation more in this course than in the material nodes course for example. Now Im not sure if that is something that can be fixed, because when you make a beginners course and explain every little detail chances are that the course will blow up in terms of length and people might loose focus/interest. There is also the chance that geometry nodes themselves might be a topic where you will end up working more closely with the documentation than with other topics, though this is probably less of an issue than balancing the course complexity.
At the end of the day this is a very informative and well structured course I think. I learned a lot and and as I said in my other thread I think the knowledge gained in this course opens up a lot of possibilities and workflow improvements so its really valuable! If Stephen goes into a little bit more background on to why we do things there would be nothing I could say which could be improved.
I guess this answer can be my feedback thread after all 